News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257426
Next 10
Followers 69
Posts 6152
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/26/2008

Re: ghmm post# 124943

Wednesday, 08/10/2011 10:39:33 PM

Wednesday, August 10, 2011 10:39:33 PM

Post# of 257426

My mistake the high dose is on-par or a bit better then NKTR-118 but they had a higher placebo response. Here is a link to the poster if anyone wants to do cross-trial comparisons and be shunned by non-investors
nektar.com/pdf/pipeline/NKTR-118/Nektar_poster118AAPM.pdf

Disregard my comments in #msg-66066644 as I listened to ADLR's CC and it seemed pretty clear that the data presented was a weekly mean number for SBMs. So, the efficacy results do appear to be legit. A few other notes from the call:

1. ADLR expects to start Phase 3 trials in the first part of 2012 and they will cost $60M. They mentioned circling back to potential partners but the tone didn't leave me with a high expectation they would land a partner prior to start of Phase 3 on their own.

2. They really pushed the tolerability profile of ADL5945 and they thought this could differentiate them from the competition (Relistor and NKTR-118 presumably).

3. Patient population in the trial was chronic non-cancer patients on high dose opioids (target population for drug).

4. ADLR expects to go forward with the .25mg BID dose in Phase 3 but hasn't entirely ruled out testing the .25mg QD dose pending further analysis.

All told, I think this is good data for ADLR and I'm surprised the stock had a muted reaction. That said, I won't be selling my PGNX shares on this news (or buying ADLR, but will keep an eye on them for now).

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today