News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 4831
Next 10
Followers 0
Posts 270
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/27/2001

Re: WTMHouston post# 1027

Monday, 01/06/2003 10:48:54 PM

Monday, January 06, 2003 10:48:54 PM

Post# of 4831
I've had two Durango's, a 2000 with the 4.7L engine and now a 2002R/T with the 360 and all wheel drive. The ride difference on the 2002 is much improved but that 360 sucks gas (11.mpg around town) and feels sluggish compared to the 4.7L. If your towing anything heavy you'll probably need the 360. I have a 4.7L also in my pickup and it's peppy also..good mileage...I average 14 around town and at a steady 70mph cruise pulls 19/20. If you don't need a HD tow vehicle opt for the 4.7L.
I'm partial to Chrysler products as I've had the best luck with them, fewest repairs and found a decent dealer....that's kind of the key to satisfaction..a good dealer.
Supposedly next year the hemi may be available in the Durango and it's supposed to be bigger overall also.

I've owned 3 suburbans, ('79, '85 and '94) they're OK...too many warranty problems.



Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today