News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257300
Next 10
Followers 54
Posts 1150
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/12/2005

Re: DewDiligence post# 124441

Thursday, 08/04/2011 11:38:40 AM

Thursday, August 04, 2011 11:38:40 AM

Post# of 257300

You’re still mixing two issues: 1) the risk of not being paid; and 2) how long it takes to get paid.

According to DNDN, the only problem is #2; claims for Provenge reimbursement are getting paid by all third-party payers.



According to DNDN, it is #1. They have Mckesson out there fading the cash flow problem (#2).

All 3rd party payers are paying VALID claims. Have been for months. The risk is in submitting a patient that a MAC decides is INvalid. With other drugs, you know that 10% of the way in and are therefore only exposed to 10% of the cost. With Provenge you don't know this until the practice is on the hook for 100%.

Truth said, the issue is both #1 and #2. Even though McKesson is fading the cash flow timing issue, that AP still is on the practice books taking up space in a practice's credit line calculation. This is why speedier payment will help even though this is not really a speed of reimbursement issue.

Also, the faster the reimbursement the faster urologists get comfortable with the fact they will be reimbursed. So speed helps with #1, too.

(And if that all sounds a little circular, welcome to my life over the last three months.)

Unless otherwise indicated, this is the personal viewpoint of David
Miller and not necessarily that of Biotech Stock Research, LLC.
We're on Twitter at BiotechStockRsr

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today