Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:52:22 PM
I believe you are taking a very slanted view of KATX, its publicity, and of its current PR firm.
As stated before you have chosen to accept as factual reports of purported unprofessional E-mails from Stanley Wunderlich. Can you provide evidence these "E-mails" exist? If so can you produce them so the purported unprofessional statements can be read in context. My E-mails received from Stanley (which I have chosen to not produce due to confidentiality) have been professional.
You use a post from someone else who has linked CFSG1 with three companies which have come under scrutiny of the SEC. As I read the associated documents I see no evidence that Mr. Wunderlich was ever accused of any wrong-doing much less convicted. I do not see that he currently represents any of these companies although they continue to exist.
You repeatedly characterize information provided to investors as pump. You specifically cite the Bedford report done about KATX. Are you aware of how pervasive Bedford reports are? Two of the mid-cap stocks I own have had Bedford reports in the past few weeks. Bedford has recently done reports on Amazon, Netflix and Bank of America. So these companies as well as the two mid-caps previously noted are pumps and dumps. I believe not.
Personally, I'm hoping for continued publicity for KATX and BVIG, be it through Bedford, articles placed on mining websites, Tim's daily list of stocks to watch, including Hot Penny Stocks, where KATX was listed for today:
http://daytradingstockblog.blogspot.com/2011/07/hot-penny-stocks-72711_27.html
By the way there is a new report about KATX which I do not believe has been brought to the board, one from Oakshire Financial:
http://oakshirefinancial.com/2011/07/27/charting-a-path-to-profits/
KATX/BVIG/KATG
As stated before you have chosen to accept as factual reports of purported unprofessional E-mails from Stanley Wunderlich. Can you provide evidence these "E-mails" exist? If so can you produce them so the purported unprofessional statements can be read in context. My E-mails received from Stanley (which I have chosen to not produce due to confidentiality) have been professional.
You use a post from someone else who has linked CFSG1 with three companies which have come under scrutiny of the SEC. As I read the associated documents I see no evidence that Mr. Wunderlich was ever accused of any wrong-doing much less convicted. I do not see that he currently represents any of these companies although they continue to exist.
You repeatedly characterize information provided to investors as pump. You specifically cite the Bedford report done about KATX. Are you aware of how pervasive Bedford reports are? Two of the mid-cap stocks I own have had Bedford reports in the past few weeks. Bedford has recently done reports on Amazon, Netflix and Bank of America. So these companies as well as the two mid-caps previously noted are pumps and dumps. I believe not.
Personally, I'm hoping for continued publicity for KATX and BVIG, be it through Bedford, articles placed on mining websites, Tim's daily list of stocks to watch, including Hot Penny Stocks, where KATX was listed for today:
http://daytradingstockblog.blogspot.com/2011/07/hot-penny-stocks-72711_27.html
By the way there is a new report about KATX which I do not believe has been brought to the board, one from Oakshire Financial:
http://oakshirefinancial.com/2011/07/27/charting-a-path-to-profits/
KATX/BVIG/KATG
