| Followers | 431 |
| Posts | 57599 |
| Boards Moderated | 5 |
| Alias Born | 01/09/2007 |
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 4:23:05 PM
Little if any verification is done by investors before they invest.
HARDLY .. but then
i speak only for myself
but i did do significant DD
back in 2008 which is why it
would be months b4 i added to
my initial buy .. since i wasn't
sure that the co. would survive
the events of the fall of 2008
when credit literally seized up
COD for COG was a fact of life
and the co. wound up carrying the
bag on one client of theirs that
filed for BK .. specifically the
reason i remained a shareholder
in expo .. and subsequently added
shares at various price points was
2 fold
first was mgmt going to restricted
common from pref'd
and second the CC in late july re: ETC
as to why mgmt had to raise their AS
in MARCH 2010 for the first time since
they *traded* on the PKS .. i know exactly
why that came to pass .. the events of late
2009 and early 2010
share reconciliation and changes at a private co.
and just to be really clear .. by mid sept 2009
i knew the intent of the *turn* and the GOAL PPS
wise re: the CELLAR ..
fyi .. nothing that happened to EXPH was *UNIQUE*
to expo holdings .. what is rather *telling* is
that EXPO actually *SURVIVED* the .. er .. attn
but only *DD* and lots of reading reveals why that is :)
==
4kids
all jmo
10/5/07 -- there are no coincidences here ...
oh and like many other longs .. not selling at this level --
