That's what I mean...
I skimmed over the dep before I began reading all the posts about it on the boards. I never got past page 8 or 9 because there was no 'there', there.
I don't know what Jeff's attorney's strategy is but, don't you think that in a trial before the Judge... or, with just a review of Canouse's dep. BY the Judge before any trial... that Canouse's feigned memory lapses and obfuscations would, in the Judges opinion, be GLARING evidence that Canouse's case should at least be thrown out the door... or, decided AGAINST with prejudice and/or frivolous to the max?
Jim
.