I certainly appreciate the effort. Please take no offense but I however didn't think that unless we are dealing with a qualified statistical sample there is little that can be concluded from the exercise.
For those who are uncomfortable with the companies communication policies after the conference call, I think the subject matter that we are dealing with including drill/assay results and acquisition negotiations really fall under the category of information that is too sensitive to release on a weekly basis. I previously thought that even if there is nothing to report that there should be an update to that effect. I have changed my mind and now feel that it was a mistake for the company to make that commitment in the first place. The reason is that I don't know how it can be determined in advance how information from the company might or might not be considered sensitive and unduly effect shareholder expectations regardless of where the information is posted. Additionally, regardless of the data released it will never please everyone no matter how good it sounds because acquisitive minds will immediately ask how the next challenge and next hurdle will be overcome. As DRCAL has mentioned and it must be remembered that we are not the experts, that given what we think we know, a slightly different deep drill/assay plan may take a lot of the risk out of finding the location for the first Audit. There could easily be alternative scientific method that could produce the same results that we don't know about. One of these days we are going to hear from the company and the consulting experts that will support the initial plans and/or propose and report about some modification that makes sense to move forward toward production. This is not rocket science but the scientific method comfortably applies to mining. Oddly enough, so does a little dose of good luck.
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
