News Focus
News Focus
Followers 44
Posts 4877
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 08/31/2001

Re: umiak post# 123101

Saturday, 07/23/2011 10:08:18 PM

Saturday, July 23, 2011 10:08:18 PM

Post# of 312101
umiak,

yes. My take is that the former CFO was innept and never very "engaged" with the company. He would primarilly be responsible for the issue at hand.

However John signed off on that. He may get stung. It's a mistake of a rookie CEO to hire bad staff because they believe in them or cannot afford better thinking it will be good enough. John has learned from it and - hopefully can move this forward.

Of course, if there were any records of John wishing the CFO to pump up the equity it is a different outcome - or at least a fiercer battle.


... listening for the other foot to fall.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y