AI
| Followers | 431 |
| Posts | 57599 |
| Boards Moderated | 5 |
| Alias Born | 01/09/2007 |
Monday, July 18, 2011 4:11:33 PM
notice .. the last 100k tap to ask
didn't *change* out what ETMM is showing
size wise on the ask? ..
smoke and mirrors
imo the 1M trade at .0003 earlier today
is legit and i suspect that is it for today
.. curious to see what shows on reg sho
<ie 1M reg sho out of 1.165.000 volume total today>
patterns seriously need to be adjusted as their predictability
is beyond apparent even with only half an eye watching
==
the funny thing re: the OS .. is what i didn't know back in 2009
was who held certs never deposited .. knowing today what i didn't
know then .. i understand why *wash trading* was resorted to for
*VOLUME* efforts .. for the 2 orchestrated runs done in 2009
<literally had no choice but to pursue that route with the always
requisite blame it on NON EXISTENT DILUTION and MGMT>
but even better
every single share on the march to the cellar has been sucked up
<about 4X over actually> which is why i'm so curious as to what
the *total* is that takes out the .0004s and .0005s
my guess is less than 75M for both .. which when one considers
what *volume* was done at .0004 .. .0003 .. .0002 and .0001 <combined>
it is rather mind boggling .. that is why the exph shorts' achilles
heel is indeed the documentation and why there is such angst
==
4kids
all jmo
didn't *change* out what ETMM is showing
size wise on the ask? ..
smoke and mirrors
imo the 1M trade at .0003 earlier today
is legit and i suspect that is it for today
.. curious to see what shows on reg sho
<ie 1M reg sho out of 1.165.000 volume total today>
patterns seriously need to be adjusted as their predictability
is beyond apparent even with only half an eye watching
==
the funny thing re: the OS .. is what i didn't know back in 2009
was who held certs never deposited .. knowing today what i didn't
know then .. i understand why *wash trading* was resorted to for
*VOLUME* efforts .. for the 2 orchestrated runs done in 2009
<literally had no choice but to pursue that route with the always
requisite blame it on NON EXISTENT DILUTION and MGMT>
but even better
every single share on the march to the cellar has been sucked up
<about 4X over actually> which is why i'm so curious as to what
the *total* is that takes out the .0004s and .0005s
my guess is less than 75M for both .. which when one considers
what *volume* was done at .0004 .. .0003 .. .0002 and .0001 <combined>
it is rather mind boggling .. that is why the exph shorts' achilles
heel is indeed the documentation and why there is such angst
==
4kids
all jmo
10/5/07 -- there are no coincidences here ...
oh and like many other longs .. not selling at this level --
