ERHC had no complicity in leaking info. If what you fear is possible what would stop a large corporation (such as SNP) paying off an officer/employee of any company they are entwined with, such as ERHC, to the tune of a few million dollars to leak info so they could void the contract? Pretty cheap out.
Above scenario is why I feel ERHC would be cleared of any charges of leaking info since they had no part in such leak.