Zeev's Turnips Talk Politics (ZTTP)

[jbennett53]

brainlessone, Your reasoning simply astounds me. George the First Bush incited these people to overthrow Saddam in 1991.
When the Kurds took that advice they were slaughtered. By your reasoning it was Saddam who caused all the grief. The Kurds expected the US Air Force to help them and for 3 weeks George sat on his rich ass. When Kissinger used these people in the 1970's the Kurds thought the US was their friend. When Henry was done with his game he left the Kurds to bear the brunt of Saddam's anger. When the US assisted in the overthrow of the Turk government and the military took over the Kurds again bore the brunt of someone's anger. I suggest you take sylvester into a Synagogue, let him run his mouth and then he runs away. I assure you that you will blame sylvester for the beating you get. By the way I gave you 2 links last night. The second one contained reference to a Hungarian. The author made an interesting comparison of what may come to pass. Did you catch that?
What do you think the tough rhetoric against North Korea from George the Second means? I think that he is playing a game with South Korea because they have been "uppity G's" lately and he wants to scare them back into their "proper place". If his deviant behaviour would lead to an invasion of the south you would blame the north. But who really would be to blame?