InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,595.76
(
0.75%
)
US TECH 100
18,933.41
(
1.01%
)
Dow Jones
41,096.77
(
0.58%
)
Brent Oil
72.08
(
0.15%
)
Bitcoin
57,945.04
(
-0.33%
)
Post# of 253104
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

investorgold2002

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 5
Posts 973
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/03/2011

investorgold2002

Re: DewDiligence post# 121910

Sunday, 06/19/2011 8:35:03 PM

Sunday, June 19, 2011 8:35:03 PM

Post# of 253104
"No one has addressed this directly,"

So all of you who are assigning non-zero (actually 20%, 30%, 40%) probability of winning based on "obviousness" of the claim "claim "copolymer of lower molecular weight is less toxic" and don't know what you are basing it on ?
Have you looked at the 1970 patent. Have you looked at prior art on copolymer for anything related to toxicity that makes such a finding obvious?

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up