I would assume the vast majority of summary judgement motions are denied for exactly this reason (facts are in dispute), and it can almost be a form reply.
Exactly.
There are two interesting facts about this MSJ. First, it was a partial MSJ on a single affirmative defense. Second, it has resulted in a bifurcated trial on the affirmative defense.
Seems a smart move by the judge.
By reviewing the PMSJ Jones has formed an opinion on the defense and she likely knows what "material facts" are at issue.
Would she be as likely to try the inequitable conduct defense separately if she thought it ill founded?
Not much here - but call it a WEAK inference of inequitable conduct.
ij
It is astonishing what foolish things one can temporarily believe if one thinks too long alone ... where it is often impossible to bring one's ideas to a conclusive test either formal or experimental. J.M. Keynes