News Focus
News Focus
Followers 6
Posts 1590
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/02/2010

Re: DandeMan post# 2104

Wednesday, 06/15/2011 1:24:02 PM

Wednesday, June 15, 2011 1:24:02 PM

Post# of 4996
Thanks for taking the time to discuss. :) I never bash stocks if you look at my post history. If I don't like one I'll just move on. I'm just a bit frustrated with the market in general and am venting.

Anyway I'd like to define what I mean by fluffy vs non fluffy PRs.

To me a non-fluffy PR is something of substance that the company has done. (This is more exclusive to the pinkie world as big board stocks tend to have built up a lot of trust. Most pinkies are in the business or selling shares, so they will promise anything so they can dilute.) Things like completing a deal (NOT and LOI), shipping a product, releasing financials, hitting a nilestone in the business plan. Something that can be verified and gives us information to the company's fundmentals.

Fluffy PRs, IMO, are promises about the future. PRs that include the words "intend to", for example. PRs about dividends and distributions when the company has no revenue. PRs about signing LOIs. Basically things that will happen in the future.

That's why I appreciate the other stock I mentioned in my previous post. They rarely promise for the future, and when they have, they have always followed through (albeit a bit late.) Most of their PRs have been milestones (shipped product, started production, etc) This company is the worst of the worst, a CE pinkie, but they've been getting up to date and releasing their financials. They've built up a lot of trust by keeping their word and not releasing non-substantive PRs. But, being a pink, it is ALOT easier to break that trust then to keep it...

That's why I'm frustrated with this. CMoney's technology may be better than NFC, but we realy don't what it is (unless I'm missing something.) This PR would have been more appropriate during or after the unveiling and demoing of their product. This is a limited info pink. They have to build up trust before telling me they are better than google. :) If this had come from a third party source...preferably a mobile banking blog, that would be a completely different thing.

If I saw signs of dilution or dumping into the PR, I'd be out. So no harm, no foul. I'm going to try to stick with it through the unveiling and the S-1. As long as there is no funny business, I'll stick it out, maybe even add some to my position.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today