IMHO, the photo was perfect. I just don't see all the ulterior motives discussed here. When I read the article, which I thought was great by the way, it really seemed to depict an "ordinary guy" a real underdog if you will, who went up against enormous powerhouses and accomplished something extraordinary, changed the course of one the biggest bankruptcies in history. The photo is perfect, showing a regular guy. I agree with the other poster who said if the photo was of a guy in a business suit, it wouldn't have the same impact. It's the whole Main Street vs Wall Street thing. It's perfect!