_________________________________________________________________
"As far as China, that is very obviously absolutely a dead end--the agreement calling for 5% of revenues in such a low margin business makes it mathematically impossible for shareholders to gain a penny--in fact, in order for a share of CPOW to increase 1 cent they would have to see revenues of over a billion dollars.
This company could not hit anywhere near that."
__________________________________________________________________
I disagree with those statements and "mathematics".
I believe, as far as the China deals, that is very obviously absolutely an open ended project, proof of that,
a 2nd JV nobody was expecting, there is much more than the eye can meet at this point.
Mathematically, that 5% can represent millions for CPOW,
given the current enormous Chongqing sales volumes, projected to increase also.
And what about the 30-40% on the JV based in China,
if we mention revenue percentages, better to get a more
complete picture, instead of "hand picking" the information
that "looks" less favorable for CPOW.
And we are not even going into jetfuel and biofuels.
We'll see what more info we gather from IBA, to add
more dots to connect.
AI
