Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,408.50
(
-1.24%
)
US TECH 100
28,244.40
(
-1.90%
)
Dow Jones
49,526.17
(
-1.07%
)
Brent Oil
0.00
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
77,236.99
(
-0.22%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257580
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

DewDiligence

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 843
Posts 122988
Boards Moderated 9
Alias Born 09/05/2002

DewDiligence

Member Level

Re: investorgold2002 post# 120639

Monday, 05/30/2011 9:29:29 AM

Monday, May 30, 2011 9:29:29 AM

Post# of 257580

What is the case for Obviousness or Non-infringement?

My previous post addressed the argument for non-infringement. The argument for unenforceability due to obviousness is that Teva’s patents at issue in the lawsuit constituted a double-patenting abuse, i.e. they were obvious extensions of prior patents that have long since expired.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today