EVOQ Properties Inc.(fka EVOQ)

[Enterprising Investor]

No objections filed or letters sent.

My fate is sealed. Content with my initial decision.

However, the question regarding "fair and equitable" treatment under § 1129(b) comes straight from the filing. However, I believe it needs to be addressed in this case. Think precedent: a "rule of law established for the first time by a court for a particular type of case and thereafter referred to in deciding similar cases."

If untested, it would establish a principle or rule that a court or other judicial body may utilize when deciding subsequent cases with similar issues or facts. Not just this one bankruptcy case, all future bankruptcy cases.

Think about the importance of Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association v. 203 North LaSalle Street Partnership 526 U.S. 434 (1999) in this case as it relates to § 1129(b)(2)(B). Charlestown filed an objection using the case one year ago today, which was a little more than two months after Berkadia (3/25/10).

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=50732468

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=48226999

Those of us not sitting at the OEC table can continue to buy shares. I just have to use a secondary account since all shares added to the primary account would be added to the tendered pile.

I am sure we would all agree it would be nice to have a done deal.