Fair enough assumption based the string of events for CCME but those are still assumptions. The way i see it , there have been PR's to some degree (albeit the negative kind, with possible lone exception of DLA/PWC combo). Those PR's may not be the one's that everybody liked and can be viewed as minimal communications from the company none the less they were / are PR's. unlike the proven frauds which had zero communications and didn't fight for anything.
That said i am not holding my breath either.
Also is it me or majority of the ones that have been proven / alleged frauds had DTT as the Auditor? at least for an year?