InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 626
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/01/2010

Re: kds_1970 post# 234233

Thursday, 05/12/2011 4:10:21 AM

Thursday, May 12, 2011 4:10:21 AM

Post# of 375420
You're still not answering the question Kwan.

And you are wrong again.

by mere association


The fact of Joe's guilty involvement is not sufficient to implicate an unrelated party.


And you are avoiding the question of why you are here at this late point in the proceedings.

I can express my First Amendment right to "Freedom Of Speech" um duh .


Neither ability nor permission are sufficient reasons to explain why you showed up here recently defending Joe Canouse, and conducting unorthodox conference calls, etc.

Let's hear it.