InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,384.61
(
0.75%
)
US TECH 100
18,311.60
(
1.42%
)
Dow Jones
39,421.12
(
0.16%
)
Brent Oil
80.89
(
-0.88%
)
Bitcoin
59,596.79
(
0.41%
)
Post# of 252865
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

zipjet

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 36
Posts 2622
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/06/2003

zipjet

Re: DewDiligence post# 118918

Wednesday, 04/27/2011 8:34:28 AM

Wednesday, April 27, 2011 8:34:28 AM

Post# of 252865

A little fudging on the awarding of bonuses is distasteful



The part I do not like is that they set a possible point score for a given goal - say 10 points. If it is achieved they get 10 points. But how can you justify 130% or giving 13 points out of 10.

Allowing over 100% allocations for achieving the goal, in this situation defines "fudging".

So when you demonstrably fail on one goal and get zero you just say you should get 200% on the goal you achieved.

I do not like it.

ij

There are times when rules and precedents cannot be broken; others when they cannot be adhered to with safety. (Thomas Joplin)

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up