Saturday, April 23, 2011 4:20:03 PM
The secondary offering made zero economic sense.
Hey frogman - that wasn't my quote, although I agreed with the substance. The underwriters hijacked our loot at both ends. Via their advanced knowledge, they scored the short game. Besides, if MNTA felt threatened by Teva, why not a secondary in the 20's?
I'm not about to sell the FLO FOUNDATION shares. However, I have some earthly advice for your intellect -
1. Cool your jets in the Charles River
2. Test CW's food prior to intake
3. Work at the GTCB pharm with GEOFF & his fellow goats
4. Most important - Be nice, be merry, & be kind to fellow posters
FEATURED Cannabix Technologies Announces First Delivery of Marijuana Breath Test (MBT) to a Major Construction Client • Mar 19, 2026 12:45 PM
ECGI Building in Crypto's Top-Performing Sector as Tokenized Real-World Assets Surge Past $26 Billion • ECGI • Mar 19, 2026 8:30 AM
Advances in Domestic Heavy Rare Earth Minerals Production Essential for North American Defense Stockpiles • ALOY • Mar 18, 2026 9:00 AM
ECGI Advances $10M Mortgage Tokenization Pilot as SEC Interpretation Adds Clarity • ECGI • Mar 18, 2026 8:45 AM
ECGI Advances Mortgage Tokenization Pilot as Institutional Market Rails Continue to Develop • ECGI • Mar 17, 2026 8:30 AM
Record Gold Prices Reshape Economics of New Mine Development • SNWGF • Mar 16, 2026 10:46 AM
