| Followers | 842 |
| Posts | 122795 |
| Boards Moderated | 10 |
| Alias Born | 09/05/2002 |
Friday, April 22, 2011 2:59:33 PM
I will continue to think that last year's offering was a mistake.
MNTA’s liquidity is substantially improved from just a few months ago, so I think it’s reasonable to assume that there will be no financings in the near future. Hence, MNTA has no economic incentive to give up something of consequence in order to boost the share price in the short run.
Posters who trade MNTA and think that MNTA’s economic incentives are aligned with theirs—and who thereby think some kind of comprehensive settlement with Teva is in the cards—strike me as unseasoned.
“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”
Advances in Domestic Heavy Rare Earth Minerals Production Essential for North American Defense Stockpiles • ALOY • Mar 18, 2026 9:00 AM
ECGI Advances $10M Mortgage Tokenization Pilot as SEC Interpretation Adds Clarity • ECGI • Mar 18, 2026 8:45 AM
ECGI Advances Mortgage Tokenization Pilot as Institutional Market Rails Continue to Develop • ECGI • Mar 17, 2026 8:30 AM
Record Gold Prices Reshape Economics of New Mine Development • SNWGF • Mar 16, 2026 10:46 AM
Cannabix Technologies Announces Commercial Launch of Marijuana Breath Test (MBT) • BLOZF • Mar 16, 2026 8:37 AM
Exxe Group Advances Platform Strategy and Share Structure Reduction Following Strategic Meetings • AXXA • Mar 11, 2026 1:03 PM
