Pretty simple agreed:
Agilyx obtained funding and garnered a lot of interest from VC well before you say they did-- period.
Comparison?
1. Establish the date-- unless you provide the exact reference, the date P2O 1st started is unknown (assume you're gonna keep this one as super secret DD too?)
2. Agilyx engineered the system from scratch and gained a patent in the process -vs- JBI continues to modify an existing system with possible patent(s) in the future. Which one do you think is quicker by common sense?
3. JBI has to date already obtained ~ $11,000,000 in funding via the investing public (accredited or not depending on the rule requirements and not counting JBI-CAN, 1st iteration), but as of yet has not garnered the scale/type of interest from the "institutional" level to include waste management or oil companies.
The other comparison I was poking at was this board's posts that spotlighted "straightforward" institutional funding that has yet to materialize while also denying the existence of considerably impressive funding of a competitor.
As to the supposed Agilyx shut down, I assumed you read the board in its entirety and was aware of that discussion given the ramifications it suggested-- again in the vein of denouncing competition. So your misrepresentation as being similar to that one was my point.
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
