News Focus
News Focus
Followers 842
Posts 122795
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: dav1234 post# 2737

Thursday, 04/21/2011 11:52:11 PM

Thursday, April 21, 2011 11:52:11 PM

Post# of 20689

…a win/win…an agreement where a tacit t-enox delay in fda response and agreement not to launch mcopax for a year if approved in 2011/2012etc.., [without] t-enox overhang MNTA doubles overnight…

I think you’re confusing what’s a win for MNTA with what’s a win for you—they are not the same thing. MNTA has no need to go to the capital markets, and hence it has no reason to pursue a deal that boosts the current share price but cedes some long-term profits.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”