I presume that GILD’s unorthodox submission sequence is what the FDA itself wants, so I do not expect a problem from the FDA. However, the sequencing could be confusing for the people on the advisory committee, which might make a difference if the vote turns out to be close.
I didn't listen to the call.
If not from today’s CC, how did you know? (It’s not mentioned in the PR.)
“The efficient-market hypothesis may be the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated in any area of human knowledge!”