InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 251706
Next 10
Followers 826
Posts 119567
Boards Moderated 14
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: pcrutch post# 118569

Wednesday, 04/20/2011 1:24:11 PM

Wednesday, April 20, 2011 1:24:11 PM

Post# of 251706
NVS has long had a more deliberate style of M&A than most Big Pharma. Exhibit A is the drawn-out pursuit of Chiron, and Exhibits B and C are the Alcon and Speedel deals, where the former was completed in three steps and the latter involved an out-license and clawback along the way.

On the other hand, the Sandoz division of NVS has used a quick-strike approach in its deals for Hexal and Eon, so there’s a disparity in style within the same corporate umbrella. Moreover, MNTA is a singular case insofar as it has expertise that could help both Sandoz and NVS’ pharma division, which makes handicapping a possible deal more difficult.

The bottom line is that I wouldn’t presume NVS is going to make a move to acquire MNTA during the next couple of years.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.