sahd3g, you said:
"The posters who come on and say they are long the stock and love the technology and then bash management for doing what they needed to do to develop the technology are babbling in circles..."
You're definitely only looking at the rosy side of things here. There have been some serious mis-steps and mis-statements along the way, so those of us who have been here for a while are, understandably, a bit skeptical of some of management's choices. Don't forget, the company may succeed BECAUSE THE TECHNOLOGY IS SO GOOD, and this may happen IN SPITE OF management's decisions.
Do you think that different choices and statements the past 4 years might poosibly have delivered a better value to shareholders now? I believe it would have.... but we'll never know for sure.
We're not "bashing" management, we're trying to watch out for our money. I have a feeling that if you had been here as long as some others, you may be a bit more critical of some of those past (and present) steps too.
My suggestion: continue your positive line. But, please don't call us long-timers "bashers" or "whiners". That's not fair. We've been next-week'd, next month'd, and next year'd almost to death.
I'm tough. I'm still hanging on.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
