InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 253352
Next 10
Followers 840
Posts 120561
Boards Moderated 14
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: biomaven0 post# 118012

Sunday, 04/10/2011 3:19:16 PM

Sunday, April 10, 2011 3:19:16 PM

Post# of 253352

So the large number of oncology drugs in trials is not overly concerning for me.

I would stop short of making such an assertion. The relevant comparison, IMO, is not between the number of cancer-drug candidates and the number of drug candidates in some other medical indication, but rather is the comparison between the number of cancer-drug candidates today and the number of cancer-drug candidates a few years ago.

As the number of cancer-drug candidates climbs ever higher, the probability that an arbitrary candidate will become a big-selling drug must necessarily decline. From a strictly mathematical standpoint, the ballooning number of cancer-drug candidates is bearish in the aggregate for investors in biotech companies that are focused entirely in this area.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.