Because the license agreement does appear to be monetary, which means no revenue from Mesh Global to MediaG3.
I meant to say...does NOT appear to be monetary, which means no revenue for the License Agreement from MGI to MediaG3.
That certainly needs to be clarified by Val et al.
The MGI IPO may be the way to go and not shares of MDGC in the near future (next several years) as I don't see how MDGC pps is going to benefit if the real work horse is Mesh Global.