InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,460.48
(
-0.41%
)
US TECH 100
19,181.60
(
-0.43%
)
Dow Jones
39,118.86
(
-0.12%
)
Brent Oil
84.85
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
61,851.49
(
1.58%
)
Post# of 21127
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Muckrakin

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 18
Posts 1653
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/28/2009

Muckrakin

Re: wdaubie post# 16280

Friday, 04/08/2011 7:17:59 PM

Friday, April 08, 2011 7:17:59 PM

Post# of 21127
So by shedding a bad person, they take over for him on a company they had no involvement until he became president? Isn't it all just a tad bit coincidental? It's not like they were on board with the company before he got involved.

Again, where is the list of major shareholders and officers to PROVE that Ault is truly not involved? Wouldn't anyone like to avoid the same issues that ZLUS.PK currently has? Even if he had no power, if he was a major shareholder, couldn't he drive the price back down to .0001 in a massive dump, after the stock starts to take off?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up