News Focus
News Focus
Followers 1
Posts 122
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/26/2008

Re: loginusername post# 3436

Thursday, 04/07/2011 12:54:05 PM

Thursday, April 07, 2011 12:54:05 PM

Post# of 8307
I would sue JPM and simply contend that they could never be an assignee ,to any more rights to the Anchor litigation proceeds , than Wamu had, when it was transferred to JPM. The only interest that they have currently, is that of a successor/assignee , to Wamu's managerial rights of the litigation, as granted under the WARRANT AGREEMENT. I believe that we DIMEQ holders have plenty of legal cause to sue JPM ( even to void any managerial fee of 15% , due under the Warrant Agree., because of JPM and Wamu's breach of their ( fiduciary ? )duty to us DIMEQ holders.).

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today