InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252334
Next 10
Followers 833
Posts 119909
Boards Moderated 17
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: genisi post# 117698

Wednesday, 04/06/2011 12:44:13 PM

Wednesday, April 06, 2011 12:44:13 PM

Post# of 252334

I think VRUS's first generation nuke RG7128 unlike the latest-generation HCV nukes is also not potent enough.

I doubt that any HCV nucleoside (as opposed to a monophosphate nucletide) could be potent enough to be a bona fide contributor in an all-oral cocktail. Performing the first phosphorylation step in vivo is too inefficient and too variable from patient to patient to allow the active triphosphate metabolite to reach a therapeutic concentration in all patients without causing unacceptable toxicity from the parent drug.

In other words, I don’t think RG7128 per se lacks potency, but rather that all first-generation nukes lack potency because they are nucleosides. That’s why I opined in #msg-61760351 that the first-generation HCV nukes and the second-generation HCV nukes are effectively two different classes of drugs.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.