Biotech analyst, Mark Schoenebaum, surveyed approximately 100 buy-side analysts, asking them which company was the biggest winner at EASL. The responses were as follows:
The definition of being a winner was not explicitly stated, but the respondents presumably thought it was a measure of how much a given company exceeded expectations. (That’s why VRTX, for instance, had a low vote in the survey—the most consequential data VRTX released at EASL were the IL28B stratifications in #msg-61716397—while INHX had a relatively high vote despite releasing also-ran data.)
Sorry, I do not have a link for this survey info.
*JNJ is partnered with both VRTX and Medivir.
“The efficient-market hypothesis may be the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated in any area of human knowledge!”