News Focus
News Focus
Followers 10
Posts 4220
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/10/2003

Re: ThSeeker post# 95760

Sunday, 04/03/2011 11:46:30 AM

Sunday, April 03, 2011 11:46:30 AM

Post# of 118239
They don't say what you make them out to say.

There are the filing that show incorporation in 2 states.



The question you are trying to answer is whether or not RCCH owns IWS.

Filings that mention Gene Newton by name are not relevant. Presumably there are documents that show Gene Newton owns a car, does that mean that RCCH owns the car?

The 'fact' that two scammers Gene and Claude file a few papers for $25 bucks incorporating different named corporations in different states is just fodder for the stock boards. It is precisely the tenuous relationships and fuzzy connections that excite those who think a google search is due diligence. It is the perfect realm for these crooks to inhabit.

But you are making an assumption that IWS can go with Claude.



It came with Claude and was temporarily included in the scam with no monetary transaction occurring, it is not even a stretch to realize that it can go under the same conditions.

If you want to make even a simple case that RCCH ever owned IWS you need to find something more substantial than Gene's name on a filing.

Gene's name is everywhere, subpoena's, judgements, lawsuits, divorce papers, etc. It would require a significant leap of faith to assume that RCCH shareholders are on the hook for any of those issues. Don't make an equally distant leap for an equally valid assumption.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today