Interestingly, the ability to sell a stock and then FTD is completely legal for a certain type of investors: market makers (including broker-dealers registered as market makers). According to SEC Rule 203(b)(2)(iii), market makers do not have to deliver shares on short sales for “bona-fide market making activities in the security for which this exception is claimed.” And who determines what are “bona-fide market making activities”? It is left to the discretion of the market maker, who may find it necessary to short the security for liquidity or market stabilization reasons or perhaps other uncertain reasons. There have been no mentions in the literature that we have found of market makers having to defend their use of this exemption.
Other unique characteristics of this exemption for the market makers are that there are no borrowing or transaction costs. Not having to borrow or actually go out in the market and buy the security, as well as not having to pay the bid-ask spread, effectively eliminates some of the greatest constraints for short selling. In addition, the market makers have no margin requirement, are not subject to Reg T, and are not required to post collateral. They have full use of the proceeds— immediately—to “hedge” the transaction.
This raises the question of what then happens to the buyer’s account, with the buyer having unknowingly purchased these naked short shares. He doesn’t receive any security, either bought or borrowed, so what does he receive? In this case, the brokers will place a marker or a pledge to deliver the shares, which are made by the seller’s clearing firm. To the buyer, he is unaware this has occurred. On his statement, it appears as if the securities were acquired and made “good delivery.” The buyer is oblivious to the fact that there are no shares in his account. He sees the debit in his account and has a statement ref lecting the securities purchase. There is absolutely no way for the purchaser to know or determine if he has a real share or a marker.