however, what would impel Starr to DOUBLE its stake? one cannot reasonably ignore the facts that Starr:
1. had a key person on the BOD; and 2. had a TON of money invested and elected to invest a TON MORE.
I can't accept that Starr was that stupid. they are no neophytes.
surely (I tell myself) they must have questioned the circumstances surrounding the Lin sales, as well as Jacky's buy. they MUST have dug into these issues that those like you and rato have raised as major red flags....
I also am encouraged by the fact that the F-H relationship appears to be confirmed. A company committing blatant fraud does not drop major coinage on a top-shelf PR firm like F-H, right?
and so the mystery continues.....
but alas, each day that goes by without aggressive action by the company in bringing in a top-shelf forensic auditing team I grow less hopeful....
rato: I'll take that $11 per share offer if it's on the table...