The delay is for the safety portion. Efficacy results should be out long before then (I think that portion of the study is 12 weeks).
Ok thanks ghmm. Disappointing to hear as a PGNX long. I guess I can pull for negative results. LOL But I'm sure there is room for both as it is a very large market.
I wasn't familiar with PGNX's compound but did a quick lookup and saw its sub-q. 118 would have the added benefit of being oral.
The oral version of PGNX's drug is in Phase 3 right now.
Do you happen to have any links to its (RELISTOR's) efficacy?
I will have to dig this up from PGNX's Web site. I think it would be useful if we could compare PGNX's Phase 3 results for the subQ version of Relistor to the Phase 2 results that exist for NKTR's drug, notwithstanding the caveats that exist of course in trying to compare drugs across different trials.
If your hoping for a negative (sorry I am not ) NKTR hasn't tested the 12.5mg dose and 5 only showed a trend but 25mg was very efficacious.
I think NKTR is an interesting company, for the NKTR118 and 119 drugs alone. And of course they have a pipeline behind those drugs. I'm just hoping NKTR doesn't weigh as an overhang on my PGNX investment.