The more centa-whatever is pumped up, the worse the downfall is going to be. Face reality, centa may be a good little company, but when/if the financials come out, my guess is it will have revenues under $5MM and marginally profitable.
As people were previously comping QASP to Boeing, Lockheed etc., now they are comping centa to Cisco/Webex, etc. Make no sense whatsoever.
Botton line is QASP is worth zero right now, may even be nothing but a liability. For shareholders, there are two options:
1. Do the merger and live to fight another day, albeit heavily diluted.
2. Have deano reappear and see the a/s doubled and QASP led by a senile crook.
I choose #1 for the measly 1MM shares I have left, that are freebies.
But the pumpers are doing more of a disservice to Jeff by inflating expectations. If centa is worth $600MM as one estimates, they would not want anything to do with a dirty pinkie in a totally separate line of business. Tech analyst like a pure play and aero/defense does not fit the mold.
As far as Webex requiring patches, everypiece of software I have by Micorsoft, Adobe, etc., has frequent updates/patches. Nothing is perfect, and circumstances/threats change. Patches are a given.
PS: Still don't like the fact that we are not going to vote on the deal. Not because of the vote itself, but because someone has control and don't know who it is.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
