News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257285
Next 10
Followers 49
Posts 5519
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/19/2006

Re: iwfal post# 115090

Friday, 02/18/2011 10:53:34 AM

Friday, February 18, 2011 10:53:34 AM

Post# of 257285

Given that bone scan is about bone remodeling, not presence of mets, the results are a wee bit odd - e.g. if it was shrinking the tumors wouldn't you expect a flare of activity at 6 weeks where the bone was healing



i don't think so. remodeling is by definition an increase in turnover and hence an increase in both osteoclast and osteoblast activity, even though the net effect is bone loss since each cycle of remodeling results in net loss of bone (resorption>formation). with treatment one would expect to see a decrease of markers of bone formation even though you are decreasing the rate of loss of bone (or increasing bone mass), since you slow down the rate of bone remodeling
at least this is what we see in postmenopausal patients, and i think it applies to other etiologies of bone loss like tumor invasion

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today