Tornado Alley (PROG)

[fuagf]

baymare, you are expounding an outdated and ignorant, view of sex education
in schools .. in the link .. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_education .. you will see ..

"In Sweden, sex education has been a mandatory part of school education since 1956. The subject is usually started
between ages 7 and 10, and continues up through the grades, incorporated into different subjects such as biology and history"

A personal little story for you. Many years ago I asked a Swedish boy who was spending a year at our school .. in which I as an off subject function taught a Personal Development course, including sex education .. what was the basic difference between Swedish kids and the kids at our high school .. his reply was .. 'kids here are so much more hung up .. more JUVENILE .. in their attitudes about sex, than high school kids in Sweden' .. he said, 'for example porn .. we were shown porn early as a part of our sex education courses, and by the time we reach this age we are tired of it .. it became boring.'

baymare, note also higher up in the link ..

"In 1936, Wilhelm Reich commented that sex education of his time was a work of deception, focusing on biology while concealing excitement-arousal, which is what a pubescent individual is mostly interested in. Reich added that this emphasis obscures what he believed to be a basic psychological principle: that all worries and difficulties originate from unsatisfied sexual impulses."

You don't seem to understand what Wilhelm Reich understood way back in 1936. Consider also ..

"Scientific studies

The debate over teenage pregnancy and STDs has spurred some research into the effectiveness of different approaches to sex education. In a meta-analysis, DiCenso et al. have compared comprehensive sex education programs with abstinence-only programs. Their review of several studies shows that abstinence-only programs did not reduce the likelihood of pregnancy of women who participated in the programs, but rather increased it. Four abstinence programs and one school program were associated with a pooled increase of 54% in the partners of men and 46% in women (confidence interval 95% 0.95 to 2.25 and 0.98 to 2.26 respectively). The researchers conclude:

....... "There is some evidence that prevention programs may need to begin much earlier than they do. In a recent systematic review of eight trials of day care for disadvantaged children under 5 years of age, long term follow up showed lower pregnancy rates among adolescents. We need to investigate the social determinants of unintended pregnancy in adolescents through large longitudinal studies beginning early in life and use the results of the multivariate analyses to guide the design of prevention interventions. We should carefully examine countries with low pregnancy rates among adolescents. For example, the Netherlands has one of the lowest rates in the world (8.1 per 1000 young women aged 15 to 19 years), and Ketting & Visser have published an analysis of associated factors. In contrast, the rates are:

* 93.0 per 1000 in the United States (85.8/1000 in 1996)
* 62.6 per 1000 in England and Wales
* 42.7 per 1000 in Canada
* 15.1 per 1000 in Belgium (1996)[55]

....... We should examine effective programs designed to prevent other high risk behaviors in adolescents. For example, Botvin et al. found that school based programs to prevent drug abuse during junior high school (ages 12–14 years) resulted in important and durable reductions in use of tobacco, alcohol, and cannabis if they taught a combination of social resistance skills and general life skills, were properly implemented, and included at least two years of booster sessions.

....... Few sexual health interventions are designed with input from adolescents. Adolescents have suggested that sex education should be more positive with less emphasis on anatomy and scare tactics; it should focus on negotiation skills in sexual relationships and communication; and details of sexual health clinics should be advertised in areas that adolescents frequent (for example, school toilets, shopping centres)."

Also, a U.S. review, "Emerging Answers", by the National Campaign To Prevent Teenage Pregnancy examined 250 studies of sex education programs. The conclusion of this review was that "the overwhelming weight of evidence shows that sex education that discusses contraception does not increase sexual activity".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_education