MNTA/TEVA: I agree 100% that a buyout is not in the cards.
OTOH, I still maintain that some cross-licensing deal on the 2 patent suits that accomplishes the same goal (maximizing joint overall profits) is not unreasonable.
Oversimplified:
"As long as no other generic is marketed MNTA/NVS get X% of tL revenue, and TEVA gets Y% of mC sales", along with some cash to make it work.
You have a ton of conditions to work through, but you can eventually get to a position that mimics an illegal price fixing deal.
Yes DD, I do know you think Commerce and/or Justice would through a hissey fit. I am less certain.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.