News Focus
News Focus
Followers 112
Posts 10856
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/01/2009

Re: Biochemist2002 post# 131883

Saturday, 02/12/2011 7:07:21 AM

Saturday, February 12, 2011 7:07:21 AM

Post# of 233825
What you wrote is all very nice misdirection....

It fails to explain the statement the SEC made on Oct 6.

I'm just reading what the SEC wrote in the letter to Ken on Oct 6...
Page 1 the item numbered

1. We note from the website of Kat Exploration that it intends to distribute shares of Kat Gold Holdings Corp. to it's shareholders and that Kat Exploration has issued public statements about such a distribution. Please explain to us the current status of this plan and how you intend to affect it.

Why does the SEC say "we note from the website" if they already knew about the distribution from some other source???

Why would the SEC ask what the status of the "plan" is and how they intend to affect it, if the SEC already had received the necessary filings pertaining to the plan to distribute shares???

I'm sure they DID do things that needed to be done in regards to buying BVIG and creating Kat Gold, and yes, there was a very long list of things the SEC wanted corrected. I can see that it's a real pain in the @ss to deal with those people. No argument from me on that. It took them 3 months to finally satisfy the SEC so they had "no further comments"!

But it does not explain why the very first item on the list of things the SEC wrote about said "WE NOTE FROM THE WEBSITE" etc.

This is 4 months after they said they were going to distribute shares, and the SEC is finding out about it through the website???

Your entitled to your opinion, and I to mine.
I just don't know how else to interpret that sentence, that is there in black and white. :)

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y