News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257251
Next 10
Followers 842
Posts 122790
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: Rocky3 post# 114472

Thursday, 02/10/2011 8:35:09 PM

Thursday, February 10, 2011 8:35:09 PM

Post# of 257251

They are talking about "net" after non-mLov revenue. I still think my [$25M per quarter] number will right (at end of '11) for "gross" overhead. I was using a too low number for other revenue.

It makes little sense to talk about “gross overhead” because it’s immaterial to investors whether reimbursement by NVS for MNTA’s in-house R&D is added to MNTA’s revenue or is deducted from MNTA’s R&D expense.

The figure of consequence for modeling purposes is the one Rick Shea gave on today’s CC: investors should expect total cash operating costs net of non-Lovenox revenue to be $15-18M per quarter for the rest of 2011.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Trade Smarter with Thousands

Leverage decades of market experience shared openly.

Join Now