News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257579
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122988
Boards Moderated 9
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: Rocky3 post# 114472

Thursday, 02/10/2011 8:35:09 PM

Thursday, February 10, 2011 8:35:09 PM

Post# of 257579

They are talking about "net" after non-mLov revenue. I still think my [$25M per quarter] number will right (at end of '11) for "gross" overhead. I was using a too low number for other revenue.

It makes little sense to talk about “gross overhead” because it’s immaterial to investors whether reimbursement by NVS for MNTA’s in-house R&D is added to MNTA’s revenue or is deducted from MNTA’s R&D expense.

The figure of consequence for modeling purposes is the one Rick Shea gave on today’s CC: investors should expect total cash operating costs net of non-Lovenox revenue to be $15-18M per quarter for the rest of 2011.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today