That story about Brock wanting to test and the others wanting to forgo the test doesn't make any common sense. Brock was canned because he wanted to test and they didn't? Then why the heck did they pay Penn State to test right after Brock was canned? Why was the Tamer not tested by Brock before he began to sell? I think you been told a bag full of Fairy Tale stories "knowhow". The Amigo's spent a lot of money for Penn State to test the Tamer and then reprint everything based on those wind tunnel test. I bet the meeting minutes show an entirely different story when the Board actually said "okay enough is enough" and parted ways with Brock. To that point everything in the prospectus was all speculation with no foundation of facts via testing the Tamer. Not verifying "should, can, and may" in print and testing theory is how you eventually get sued and lose the company to litigation. I'm sorry knowhow. Brock may be a friend, but his story (according to you) doesn't ad up.