News Focus
News Focus
Followers 842
Posts 122795
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: oc631 post# 1571

Wednesday, 02/09/2011 1:33:17 AM

Wednesday, February 09, 2011 1:33:17 AM

Post# of 20689

Teva will never be allowed to buy MNTA for the reasons you stated so this topic is moot. Regardless, the assumption that nobody would want own branded Copaxone if MNTA/TEVA brought generic Copaxone to market ascribes no value to branded Copaxone under this scenario.

If Teva and MNTA were joining forces to bring a generic Copaxone to market, success would be virtually guaranteed. Under this scenario, why would a third party want to promote branded Copaxone knowing that a substantial portion of the benefit would accrue to a generic competitor?

They wouldn’t, of course, and hence branded Copaxone under such a scenario would effectively become just another generic.

This whole discussion is moot for the reasons already mentioned.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”