News Focus
News Focus
Followers 16
Posts 1779
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 12/30/2010

Re: tbirdman post# 72040

Tuesday, 02/08/2011 1:42:07 PM

Tuesday, February 08, 2011 1:42:07 PM

Post# of 94785
I'm sure it has. If the article had the formula for Coca-Cola, you better believe they'd take it down as fast as John Bird can buy massive quantities of highly speculative puts two days before the MW release after day 6 of Reg SHO.

However the question Value08 was asking was whether potential liability exists for SA once it's brought to their attention that the Chirin article is based on forgery and false documentation to manipulate the market. Depending on the presentation to SA, it seems yes for criminal (liability to the government agencies as an accessory) but no for private causes of action. Chirin is not immune from private causes of action. SA will most likely successfully claim broad immunity from subpoena and discovery in private causes of action against Chirin as well.

See my previous message for disclaimer, etc.

-Andrew

Trade Smarter with Thousands

Leverage decades of market experience shared openly.

Join Now