News Focus
News Focus
Followers 6
Posts 605
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/30/2009

Re: ratobranco post# 71909

Monday, 02/07/2011 11:27:13 PM

Monday, February 07, 2011 11:27:13 PM

Post# of 94785
CCME - my post was a response to a prior post, which stated the $100m number there.

One thing for sure: Chimin's SAT form is not authentic.

Because of Rato's response, I started reading Chimin's SA article. There was an attached SAT form. Strange thing is, the SAT form has CCME's Chinese name (Fujian FenZhong), a very low revenue and low tax amount, but no signature by the legal representative of the company (ie. the owner), as required by the form, and no company's official seal (red stamp) as is custom in China.

I am 100% sure (and I normally does not use 100% when expressing an opinion) that the SAT form as presented by Chimin is not an authentic SAT form. It is as if someone put up Obama's name on an empty 1040 and claims Obama did not pay any taxes?

PS. Here is the link to Chimin's pdf file (directly from from SA.)

http://www.scribd.com/doc/48276706/Ccme-Saic-and-Sat-Filings

You can check the pages 5, 6 and 7. You do not need to read Chinese to know there is is no signature or red stamp. Only typed words and numbers.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today