Lebosco, that is EXACTLY my point. I think it should be the Judge that makes this crystal clear but I have ABSOULUTELY no faith in somebody who wrote an opinion she wrote. She wrote this FULLY KNOWING better, basically saying there is no equity over 95 times in her 109 page report and then to say what had a little value called the NOLs was buried on pages 98-99 was nothing but PURE LIES on her part. Yes, unfortunately pure lies, trying to say something like the 110 year name and insignia has no value. If that is not a pure fabrication, then I do not know what I am talking about.