Saturday, February 05, 2011 8:43:09 AM
First, the first document is URGENT and CONFIDENTIAL. I would think an allegaion would be too. Who would give the authoritity to release details of an allegation with an investigation going on?
Second, the document talks about the filing being made on Jan. 31st. At I recall the filing was made on the 27th and POSTED ONTHIS BOARD on the 31st.
Something smell beyond fishy there.
What's with the May 23 2008 date on the subpoena?
Why is this not also a PR?
Why does all this appear to be in response to what is posted here?
Why is the letter written to Computer share? Where is the corrected SOS filing?
There is a lot more meat on this bone and holes all in the update. It seems that this info has been put out to appease the changing sentiment on this board.
Very, very dangerous indeed.
ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) Launchs IQ Nano Drone for Commercial Indoor Use • HALO • Oct 10, 2024 8:09 AM
CBD Life Sciences Inc. (CBDL) Targets Alibaba as the Next Retail Giant for Wholesale Expansion of Top-Selling CBD Products • CBDL • Oct 10, 2024 8:00 AM
Foremost Lithium Announces Option Agreement with Denison on 10 Uranium Projects Spanning over 330,000 Acres in the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan • FAT • Oct 10, 2024 5:51 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Reports Significant Progress in Community Relations and Development Efforts in Chachas, Peru • ELEM • Oct 9, 2024 10:30 AM
Unitronix Corp Launches Share Buyback Initiative • UTRX • Oct 9, 2024 9:10 AM
BASANITE INDUSTRIES, LLC RECEIVES U.S. PATENT FOR ITS BASAFLEX™ BASALT FIBER COMPOSITE REBAR AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING • BASA • Oct 9, 2024 7:30 AM